Question

每年，武大、華科等大學(xué)都通過面試自主招收學(xué)生，并不斷有新的學(xué)校加入到這一行列。這一新的招生方式在學(xué)生中引發(fā)了一場討論。假如你是李華，請(qǐng)根據(jù)下表提供的內(nèi)容給《英語廣場》編輯寫一封信反映討論情況。
60% 的學(xué)生贊成  40%的學(xué)生反對(duì)
贊成：1．面試可以全面綜合地評(píng)價(jià)一個(gè)學(xué)生；
2.鼓勵(lì)學(xué)生發(fā)展個(gè)性和特長；
3．社會(huì)需要一種更加開放和有效的錄取方式。    
反對(duì)：1.面試帶有主觀性、片面性，可能不公正；
2.并非所有學(xué)生都擅于在面試中展示自己；
3.不可能在3-5分鐘內(nèi)評(píng)價(jià)一個(gè)人。
注意： 1.詞數(shù)：100左右
2.開頭已為你寫好，不計(jì)人總詞數(shù)。
3. 已給出的信的開關(guān)和結(jié)尾不得抄入答題卡.
參考詞匯：comprehensive綜合的，subjective主觀的，one-sided片面的，evaluate評(píng)價(jià)
（以下所給內(nèi)容不得抄入答題卡）
Dear Editor,
Recently, a discussion has been held in our school on whether it is reasonable for the universities to admit students through interviews. The results are as follows:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Answer 1

One possible version
60% of the students support this action. They express that interviews can evaluate a student in a more thorough and comprehensive way. It can encourage students to develop their own interests and personalities. What’s more, with the development of society, a more open and efficient way to test a student’s abilities is needed.
On the other hand, the other 40% students are against this idea. They argue that first, interviews may be subjective and one-sided, which could lead to unfairness. Second, not all students are good at showing their talents in interviews. Last but not least, a student can’t be judged in only three or five minutes.

寫出兩部分人對(duì)通過面試自主招收學(xué)生的不同觀點(diǎn)，同時(shí)也可以發(fā)表個(gè)人觀點(diǎn)。