Pushy parents and teachers who “hothouse” the under-5s risk causing damage to the children’s long term development, a leading education expert said.
Lilian Katz, Professor of Education at the University of Illinois, said that four-year-olds engaged in reading and writing went on to perform worse academiclly than those engaged in imaginative learning. They scored higher in tests at the age of 5, but children whose first year at school was stimulating outstripped them four years later.
The findings suggest that the government's structured approach to early years' learning could be storing up problems for children. They also raise serious questions about the plan for all children to be able to read by the age of 6.
In many countries formal teaching does not start until children are 6 or 7 and have improved their social and manual skills. Children start learning to read and write at 6 in the United States. France and Germany , and at 7 in Finland and Sweden.
Professor Katz said that in many schools the courses were "boring children to tears". Much academic teaching required children to learn by memorizing pieces of information out of context, she said. Teaching in reception class should instead allow children to develop their intellect by exploring their environments and asking questions.
"Research suggests the benefits of formal academic insturction for four- and five-year-olds seem to be promising when they are tested early, but considerably less so in the long term. When these children are followed over a period of three or more years, those who had early experience in more intellectually engaging curricula were more likely to do well in school than their peers, who had received early academic instruction." She avocates teaching children through first-hand experience and play, in mixed-aged classes. This can include puppet shows, drawing or running a pretend shop in the classroom.
1.According to the passage, those who “hothouse” the under-5s would probably _________.
A. prefer a lot of interaction and stimulation while teaching
B. teach in a lively way to motivate kids’ interest
C. push the kids to memorize pieces of information
D. care about the kids’ physical development
2.What does the underlined word “ outstripped” in Paragraph 2 mean?
A. did better than B. looked down upon
C. caught up with D. performed worse than
3.According to Lilian Katz, the government’s structured approach to early-years learning ______.
A. is necessary for improving children’s reading and writing ability
B. needs to be improved to develop children’s academicability
C. will cause problems to children in their future learning
D. has more advantages than disadvantages
4.The message the author wants to deliver through the passage is that formal teaching _______.
A. can start at different times in different countries.
B. should not be started too early
C. is best carried out in Finland and Sweden
D. should include teaching children social and manual skills
5.Which of the following is NOT the opinion of Lilian Katz?
A. Children should be taught through first-hand experience.
B. Learning in a mixed-age class is good for children.
C. Running a shop can help children get good marks.
D. Puppet shows and drawing are useful easy in teaching children.
1--5 CACBC
本文屬于教育類文章。研究發(fā)現(xiàn)過早接受正規(guī)教育雖然能使兒童在開始時學(xué)業(yè)優(yōu)秀,但對其以后的發(fā)展會造成很多問題。
1.C 細節(jié)理解題。文章第一段說明這種教育模式會對五歲以下的兒童的長遠發(fā)展造成危害,而從第五段“….. required children to learn by memorizing pieces of information out of context…..”可知,這種教育模式是側(cè)重于死記硬背。
2.A 詞義猜測題。由第一段及第二段中的第一句可知五歲前接受讀寫訓(xùn)練的孩子在四年后成績不如那些曾經(jīng)在一年級接受過啟發(fā)性教育的同齡人。
3.C 細節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)文章第三段可知政府的固定教育法會給孩子將來的發(fā)展留下許多隱患。
4.B 推理判斷題。從第四段我們可知孩子在六、七歲以后,社交技能和動手技能才得到發(fā)展,所以正確的做法是讓學(xué)生在探究環(huán)境中和提問的過程中開發(fā)智力,而不是過過多的正規(guī)教育要求學(xué)生死記硬背很多東西(第五段),因此說明了過早實施正規(guī)教育對孩子沒有益處。
5.C 細節(jié)理解題。從文章最后一段的最后兩句“She advocates teaching children through…., include puppet shows…”可知A、B和D三項是Lilian Katz所贊成的,C項意思與原文有偏差。
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:閱讀理解
通讀下面短文,掌握其大意,然后在各題所給的A,B,C,D四個選項中,選出一個最佳答案。
As I had my first child, I promised myself never to be a pushy parent. I was going to be a very 36 and understanding mother.
Five years later my little boy was about to 37 for his yellow belt in karate(空手道). As a five-year-old child, he wasn’t taking it 38 , because it was Mom trying to help him. I found myself yelling and telling him he would never get the belt acting like that. I was trying to 39 him his back-flip(背摔). He continued to play and I continued to 40 . Finally I had made him feel like he couldn’t 41 anything, just as I promised myself I wouldn’t do.
Still mad and stubborn I couldn’t 42 . I had to teach him his flip. He was doing fine with it by the time we had to leave to go to karate. While taking the test, he did 43 . His instructor would ask him to do something, and it became 44 for him. He never asked him to do the back-flip. He had passed his yellow belt test.
We got in the car to 45 when he looked at me and said ”Mom, why did you make me do that back-flip so many times, 46 it wasn’t even on the test.” The words wouldn’t have 47 anything to anyone else, but it was a slap in my face. That night while 48 in bed, I told him I loved him.
He was 49 and didn’t say anything, just giggled. I said “I really do love you baby.” I was still feeling 50 , and also wondering if he had 51 me. Finally he replied in the 52 voice, “I know you do, but I love you more.”
He had forgiven me and I had decided that his feeling were more 53 than any test he would 54 take. I made a new 55 to be better mother and to accept that he was only a child.
A.patient B.good C.polite D.a(chǎn)ffectionate
A.look B.test C.play D.practise
A.easy B.happily C.seriously D.fairly
A.help B.tell C.make D.teach
A.yell B.speak C.smile D.teach
A.a(chǎn)cplish B.feel C.try D.pass
A.give up B.give out C.give away D.give in
A.bad B.worse C.great D.better
A.quick B.natural C.mon D.normal
A.go shoppingB.go home C.rest ourselves D.enjoy ourselves
A.while B.once C.when D.if
A.expected B.meant C.demanded D.reached
A.reading B.studying C.lying D.talking
|